I'm not refuting the deaths of children, because I simply do not personally have the evidence to state that "nothing happened". However, I really want to know why NBC explicitly stated that ONLY FOUR HANDGUNS were found inside the school (read: no AR-15) and, as far as I'm aware, has never recanted this report yet other news agencies, including NBC, have continued on as if the AR-15 was the only weapon used (which coincides with the supposed coroner's evaluation that all wounds were caused by an AR-15).
As far as Robbie Parker is concerned, there's something going on there. I actually like Anderson Cooper, but his choice to label anyone who raises legitimate concerns about what was reported to the public about Sandy Hook as insane, nutty conspiracy theorists just didn't sit well with me. I've seen people grieve, too, Anderson. Never have I seen reactions or mannerisms like those I saw from Robbie Parker or Veronique Pozner.
Ah, yes. Veronique Pozner. You all thought Robbie Parker was bad, but the Pozner interview was red flag after red flag. The biggest of which, at least for me, was this line spoken by Pozner: "It takes 9 months to create a human being and it takes seconds for an AR-15 to take that away from the surface of this Earth."
Was this interview Chroma Keyed? At 3:00, AC's nose disappears. Uh... awkward.
Her voice did not tremble. She spoke as if it was rehearsed. Her tone did not in ANY WAY match that of a grieving mother. And, perhaps most notably, she named the AR-15 specifically.
"... Because that weapon fell in to the hands of a tormented soul." There was a shotgun in the trunk. There were at least 2 handguns found (let's just ignore the NBC report for a moment). He could have brought a Louisville Slugger to recess and start batting kids around like wiffle balls. He could have taken a basic Chemistry class and tossed bleach and ammonia in to a classroom and locked the door. He could have went online and in 5 minutes learned how to create a crude explosive device. But he didn't. He took his mother's firearms and used those instead.
Oh, yeah. They were his mother's firearms. The mother, who was evidently not a psychopath, who attained the weapons legally as far as I know. So, what now, parents with mentally challenged children can't have firearms? Should we extend this to autism? What about children who are chronic sleepwalkers? These are all potentially dangerous factors!
Pozner spoke only of the AR-15 as if the AR-15 woke up that morning, decided to shoot Adam Lanza's mother and then forced him to drive to Sandy Hook Elementary where the AR-15 just went off on its own and then framed Adam Lanza for what it just did.
The Pozner interview was the biggest, brightest red flag of the Sandy Hook media frenzy. Yet because normal people, not crazy people, but normal, intelligent, totally sane people ask questions, we are all lumped together under the wackadoodle banner and scolded.
Know what the best part is? I don't even own a gun because I don't have the money. But as a combat veteran, I know how to use one and yes, I'd like to own multiple firearms. And I will, someday. People who break the law aren't going to care what rules you put in place. All you're doing is allowing law abiding citizens to be outgunned in their own home because they chose to follow the law and go through the proper channels to acquire a firearm that could not stand up to what criminals would be bringing to the table.
I'll be damned that if when my wife gives birth next week to our first son and we move to the city in a year or so that I will not have trained my wife how to properly operate a handgun, bolt-action rifle, assault rifle and shotgun. I'm going to be at college all day. I will NOT allow my family to be victims in a dangerous world because we had to get a peashooter with a 5 round magazine whereas the criminals stuck to the tried-and-true AK-47s with 30+ rounds and high capacity Glocks, all due to some garbage about how firearms are pure evil and that the mind of a spree killer is not the most dangerous weapon in the scenario.